We may
need to identify the highly ordered main stations on the road to
some final or infinite ethical state. We may have to learn how to
extract people from a lower state of ethical affairs, into a higher
and higher and yet still higher state of ethical affairs. Perhaps we
will never make ethically mature decisions until we learn what
values are a part of what ethical system and how man moves from one
set of ethical values to the next set of ethical values.
A view
of ethical behavior from a systems point of view might lead
one to hypothesize that certain values are appropriate to certain systems
of ethics but that these same values might be inappropriate to other
ethical systems. Thus instead of the earlier ethical beliefs being immature
but quite like later ethical beliefs it may be that the later
ethical values
are quite unlike the earlier ethical values. And it may be that he who is
living by an earlier ethical system cannot conceive that a later system
is possible or its values anything but wrong. It may be that when we
look at earlier ethical systems from within a later ethical system,
we will
see that the earlier values, no matter how appropriate in a later system,
are not only appropriate to, but absolutely necessary for living in the
conditions which exist when that earlier system is present. If any or
some of these speculations are true, possible we can see why we have
problems in the region of ethical behavior.
Perhaps the way to
achieve
the ethically sensitive, ethically mature decision maker is quite different
from the ways being tired to produce such today. Or as
Allport has said:
"The
determinists are right in saying that the fabric of the world is
structured and orderly. But they are wrong in believing that the
fabric of a given life has reached its final form. The relative
freedom of man lies in his seeking and utilizing knowledge that will
enable him to discover the final shape of his life." (4, p.
564)
<<back
12 End of file