Single
Principle Ethical Theorists
Each
of these theorists formulates his principle of morality and each
attempts to distinguish between right and wrong with reference to
that principle. Those who have contributed single principle or absolutistic
ethical theories are legion, to mention one would only be to
slight another. In general the theorists dominated thought about ethical
behavior up through the eighteenth century and also into much of the
nineteenth century.
The
problem with the single principle theories is that they are carefully
reasoned opinions but are, by and large, not open to research
investigators and thus are not open to disproof.
The
Many Moralities Theorists
The
representative theorist here is of course, Nietzsche. The difference
between the Nietzsche-like theorists and the single-principle theorists
is clear and distinct. The many moralities theorists insist that there
are many moralities which are actually mores and not morals. They
are mores not moralities because they are relative to culture.
But
– the difference between the multiple morality theorists and the single
principle theorists involve more than this one point. The multiple moralities
theorists see a different approach to the problem of understanding
moral behavior. Their problem is not what is the principle of
morality, but rather, what are the answers to two questions. What is
the
natural history of each morality? And, are there commonalities from one
set or mores or ethics to another set or mores or ethics?
In a
scientific sense those who share the Nietzsche position have
advanced over the single principle theorists. The multiple
moralities position
allows for empirical findings, for the possibility of disproof and it
allows the possibility of prediction. Yet, from another angle the Nietzsche-like
position presents problems. It argues that moral judgments are
not fact but only feelings which are in turn symptoms of most
valuable facts
concerning cultures. This position may lead and mislead at one and
the same time. The many moralities theorists see that ethics are
symptomatic but they may lead us to the wrong conclusion as to what
it
is
they are symptomatic of. Furthermore, these theorists have not gone on to
design models consistent with their position; they have not gone on to
draw hypotheses which could stem from such a model; they have not
gone on to extensively test their hypothesized position and they have
not gone on to reconstruct their theory as new evidence has come
to be.
<<back
4 next>>
|