|
|
|
Today, I shall try to throw
some light on these fourth and fifth generation problems by
discussing them in relation to some recent trends in psychological
thought. They will be considered because subsequent to my research
into the history and current status of the profession, I came to
agree with the warning Cone directed toward you last year when he
said that there is danger of unnecessarily limiting the
capabilities of Value Analysis. And such will be considered
because I believe that if and when your problems are examined in
relation to recent changes in my discipline (psychology), that it
may help you avoid what Cone fears and may help you achieve what
Strichman said is possible, namely,
" . . . that there
is no reason why Value Analysis and Value Engineering concepts
cannot be applied to everything one does in an
organization."
But in order for me to
discuss these problems with you, I must take a few moments to
acquaint you with a new way of thinking about the how and why of
man’s behavior.
Beginning a decade or so
before the birth of Value Analysis was a questioning of the
existing explanations of why man behaves as he does and of how he
behaves. This questioning continued through the forties and
fifties. Now, in the mid-sixties, we, in my profession, are in the
midst of a change as revolutionary to the field of psychology as
Value Analysis has been to the field of cost control. Two of these
changes are particularly pertinent to your problem.
The first change in
psychological thought is that we are discarding the concept of man
as a pain avoiding, pleasure-seeking creature. We no longer accept
that the reason why man behaves is to free himself from tension,
to find a life without stress. A tentative statement of what we
now believe is – that man seeks to build up tension because its
subsequent release provides him what he desires. What man wants
out of life is to expend the energies that arise within him as a
result of the problems of being alive, because it is expending
energy that gives meaning to his life. But to comprehend this new
formulation of why man behaves, it is necessary to know that
sometimes man becomes so confused in respect to what he thinks he
wants, existence without tension, that he goes overboard. When he
goes overboard, he does such things as try to maintain the status
quo, resist changes, and the like. Man falls into this errant way
of living particularly when he is operating at lower Levels of
Human Existence, a phrase referring to a conception of how man
behaves which is the second change in psychological thinking,
which we need to examine before we look more deeply into your
fourth and fifth generation problems.
<<
back | 2 | next>>
|
|
|