From the Historical Collection of the work of Dr. Clare W. Graves
William R. Lee                                                            - presentations, papers, recorded transcripts, notes -                                                             February 2002
Seminar on Levels of Human Existence, Washington School of Psychiatry, October, 1971


            

Dr. Graves:    Intellectual hedonism is the disguise of a new kind of Christianity or religion to which they are trying to draw converts and it is mystical, now there is something to this phenomena. But not what transcendental mediators are selling. This phenomenon is a terrible interesting one, but I believe that the way it is operating today it is just another form of the puritan ethic. This is the same old thing coming around over and over again: discipline. For centuries we’ve been going through this, not the way it’s being practiced, not the way, It is being carried on in public.

 

            Let me illustrate it in this manner. What one of the evidences within the theoretical system of the total personality is insatiability; can’t get enough of something. A person deeply involved in transcendental meditation can’t get enough of two things: 1) of the TM experience and  2) he must be active, active all the time. This says it is a total state. This is why I say it is intellectual hedonism. And listen to what the man says and put it down on paper and then ask yourself afterwards – what was this that I listened to? I listen to him once. I couldn’t tell what the man was saying. He was just playing with words. When the man says Transcendental Meditation has the answers to the problems of the universe. This is just false science. He says “Just listen to me!” – and he talks for an hour and says nothing. It’s all solved. You’ll see the solution. That’s an impractical being. I say that it’s intellectual hedonism!

 

Question:    What about problem solving? The problems that are, let’s say, in the South Sea and Asian areas? They have pressures and environmental problems and their lifestyles are so different?

 

Dr. Graves:   Not difficult at all when you get the full feeling for the concepts which are in the paper: Levels of Existence: An Open Systems Theory of Values, Fall, 1970, Journal of Humanistic Psychology . . . . Concepts of Thema and Schema. At a particular level of existence any human being, no matter what the circumstances in which they are living, will develop the same THEMA for existence that they are centralized in. But depending upon the particular characteristics of the world in which they are living, and the particular characterization of their individual minds, that is, both N and O systems can vary in particular even though they are very much alike in general. You can have the same THEMA of existence with very, very different SCHEMATIC forms  . . . and the most outstanding example that I can give you is this. When referring to THEMA and SCHEMA – this is the only difference between the theoretical point of view of orthodox Christianity and orthodox Communism. They are the same thing. They are both sacrifice/deny self to get later systems. Yet, SCHEMATICALLY they are very, very different. This is an aspect of thinking which one has to be kept in mind all the time. The refined Hindus and the Pakistanis are at war with one another. General Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and my work have shown that the greatest battles always exist between people whose thinking is closest together. There is no difference between a Pakistani and a Hindu; THEMATICALLY. They are the same psychological human being.

 

Question:   When you talk about civilizations around the world and the problems that they have tosolve, how does this related to individual health?

 

Dr. Graves:   Remember, I have a dual concept of health. It depends on whether you have an alterably closed or unalterably closed person. I don’t want an error in understanding this. I want, however, to emphasize a different point when I talk about problem solving. What man cannot stand is to solve his problems. So, in the solution of the problems he now has, he creates a new set of problems to be solved. As he solves the problems A - he create problems B and as he solves problems B - he creates problems C. Now, what is the major problem the H-U person has according to my data? Can anyone extrapolate and get it? His major problem is - how do you live when you have no problems? That’s his major problem! How do you live when you have no problems? That has to be a problem!

 

Question:     How can you determine the true personality characteristics of a C-P person?

 

Dr. Graves:   The theory says that the only person who would give you a pure C-P picture is a very closed C-P. You only get centralized data of a pure level nature from a solid closed level person. This doesn’t happen very often since most people are not that closed. They may be at many different levels depending upon the situation.                    

 

[Presentation ends]

 

Transcription and notes by William R. Lee

        

previous < | 72 | > start
 

  
© 2002, Copyright William R. Lee and NVC Consulting
www.ClareWGraves.com