From the Historical Collection of the work of Dr. Clare W. Graves
William R. Lee                                                            - presentations, papers, recorded transcripts, notes -                                                             February 2002
Seminar on Levels of Human Existence, Washington School of Psychiatry, October, 1971


            

Question:    Persons with diplomas who want out of the stream of our society just don’t care about the kind of rat race we run each day. Is that a cop-out when they may see themselves simply as world travelers? The whole concept of leisure is changing in today’s world. 

                           

Dr. Graves:   Conditions of existence do change. But that is not the conditions of existence in which he is living. He’s living in the conditions of existence where the world needs all our skills; babies in hospitals, homes that need cleaning up, people at the B-O level that need aid. That person is not with this world.

 

Question:    Is it that one must have a job to be qualified in this world?

 

Dr. Graves:    I didn’t say anything about a job. I said that a person who sits and cannot see that other human beings are in a difficult state of affairs and he sits over here in his hedonism and that is not the kind of personality we want.

 

Statement:   Yet, so many people we try to give help to won’t accept it.

 

Dr. Graves:    Not people at the B-O or A-N level. They’ll take all that we can give.

 

Question:   Would it be fair to ask from which level does the answer come that someone ought to be helping – the others in need?

 

Dr. Graves:    We are looking at a point of view within a theoretical framework. Within this theoretical framework there are only two levels of behavior where I have found this sort of thing to arise. I find this kind of hedonism arising in the C-P system and in the E-R system. Usually when the E-R system is in transition to the F-S, I would say that I think I am looking at this moment from the G-T level where I’m saying, that if you think within these concept . . . where the serious problem that man has is getting mankind, the rest of mankind, as much of mankind as we can, above the E-R level of existence, can you afford to have anyone sitting around strumming his fiddle?

 

Question:     What about intellectual hedonism as in the search for truth? A person who walks away from loyalty, etc. and goes into the country for 20 years and after his lifetime is recognized as trying to find the truth or God or whatever. Is this kid really with the situation?

 

Dr. Graves:    My statement would be – yes! You see, the intellectual hedonism of the day for me is transcendental meditation. Playing with pleasure!  I do you not see that I have said that my data says that the human organism is beyond the pleasure principle. Not as Freud said. Beyond the pleasure principle in man in that he is a problem solving organism, that he wants to solve problems more than he wants pleasure. When he settles down to pleasure he is not being.

           

Dr. Graves:    This is a general systems concept, an open systems concept, a concept of the gross theoretical system in which I’m operating. I don’t think that way you state. I try to explain Eastern philosophies within a larger system. General system theory says that eastern philosophy is hedonist thinking.                                                                                          

 

Question-statement   Regarding Transcendental meditation - not yoga, etc. I’m exposing myself to this group, exploring this group, meeting with them, training sessions, etc. I can’t see preoccupations with pleasure. College students – SIMS – The students International Meditation Society – hard work and helping others, etc.

      

previous < | 71 | >next
 

  
© 2002, Copyright William R. Lee and NVC Consulting
www.ClareWGraves.com