From the Historical Collection of the work of Dr. Clare W. Graves
William R. Lee                                                            - presentations, papers, recorded transcripts, notes -                                                             February 2002
Seminar on Levels of Human Existence, Washington School of Psychiatry, October, 1971


            

We picked up that part of the data that some systems respond to one kind of authority and another system responds to another kind of authority. But . . . they always respond to authority if they are even numbered systems with this representation.  

 

            My data also said, and this is very important, that the degrees of behavioral freedom of the human being increase as he moves up the levels of human existence, that he has more choices. At the lowest levels of human existence the choices he can make are very limited. The reason that this is important is that if you believe, as I do, that behavior must ultimately be benched in the brain, than I’ve got to have some way of accounting for the fact that in the brain of man the choices are limited at the lowest level of human existence.

 

            Each system is increasing in size as we move up the levels of human existence. In Figure 1, the seventh system isn’t drawn properly in terms of size. If this system were drawn properly its represented size would be more than all the space in systems 1-2-3-4-5-6 – all together – in order to account for this tremendous jump, tremendous change in behavior that I ran into when I put the express self with concern for others persons in the problem solving situations.

 

            I’m not going to go into the detail of this. Anyhow, I tried to represent here the basic change in the data that were dictated to me as some kind of a pictographic story of what personality is like. And I tried to show, that on the base line, these changes take place as the person has less and less vital problems to deal with. A – represents the most vital problem of the human being. B – C – D – E – F – G – H are less vital, in a sense, because they represent different existential problems.

 

            I had to say that this is based in the brain. Remember that I was working back in time. I hypothesized that the brain of man must be structured someway or another, probably functionally not physically, into a series of hierarchically ordered dynamic neurological systems. Someone ought to be able to identify this system of the brain that runs man when the A conditions are the important thing to do.

 

            When man has solved the problems in the A condition there ought to be identifiable in, the brain of man, the O system which man operates under when he is trying to solve the B problems. And there should be in the brain the P system which somehow or another takes over and organizes the behavior of the organism after he has solved the B problems and when he is dealing with the C problems of existence.

 

            I now define the A problems as those problems involving the operation of the imperative periodic physiological needs of the organism. And I further hypothesize that there is a functional system in the brain that specifically relates to the task of running the vital processes, periodic in nature, in the organism. The B problems I now define as those problems involving the physiology of the organism that do not have the characteristic of periodicity in them, in other words, the problems of shelter and that sort of thing. These are the problems the human being is attempting to solve at this time. This gives something distinct, demonstrably distinct about the N system, that it would be different not only in its structure or its network in the brain but it would also be different in terms of the stimuli which will activate it. Only certain stimuli will cause the N system to run. The N system is alert to certain or as I put it in my latest writing . . . “we are equipped by nature with certain information processing devices and certain decision making equipment to handle in an hierarchically ordered way a series of problems of human existence.”  

            The N system can be demonstrated as to be distinct and I say that you can set up an experiment which will show that if you use one kind of stimulation you don’t activate that system. We have the methodology for doing this. We have the methodology for showing that if you use another kind of stimuli you can activate the O system but you won’t activate the N system and you won’t activate the P system.                                                                                                 

   

previous < | 41 | >next
 

  
© 2002, Copyright William R. Lee and NVC Consulting
www.ClareWGraves.com