From the Historical Collection of the work of Dr. Clare W. Graves
William R. Lee                                                            - presentations, papers, recorded transcripts, notes -                                                             February 2002
Seminar on Levels of Human Existence, Washington School of Psychiatry, October, 1971


            

Question:    Is this closing down of those who don’t make it to the next level widespread in our country today?

 

Dr. Graves:    Let me answer you by starting this way. If you study, this which we are looking at here, as a historical cultural phenomenon over the long run of time, one of the things which will stand out is that anytime a transition in man has taken place there has always been a big upsurge in the use of drugs. One kind of drug at one time and another kind of drug at another time, and this can pretty well be traced down as to what drugs were used by what people and at what time and in what transition they were in. Now, in other words, as one comes to the end of a way of life which he has been living, comes to the end of D-Q or E-R or F-S . . . and this way of life no longer is solving the problems of existence that he has, he’s now thrown into a state of crisis. In his attempts to solve it and move forward his first step is a regressive step. He goes backward and then tries to find his way forward from behind this anxiety producing situation. If in the course of this movement he comes upon drugs, alcohol, any of the other means we have at our disposals which are ready dissolvents of alcohol, he will grasps them. You can get a person who turns to drugs in the D-Q to E-R transition but most of the ones we’ve been running into recently . . . where we’ve seen, as far as many people are concerned, an alarming trend which tells you something about what the values of our society are like. . . are turning up in the affluent class, throwing off the materialism of their parents and trying to make the E-R to F-S transition.

 

            This is very important if someone is going to work with this person. This determines just how you’re going to work with this person. If we find, as my evidence does, that a person was in the D-Q system, his history shows this . . . he’s gone into this transition, and in the course of it he turned to drugs and now he has turned to becoming a Jesus Freak. Using the typical everyday psychiatric terminology there’s a problem of buttoning up the system – putting this person’s defenses in there – tightening it up and letting him stay there . . . letting him settle down into becoming a Jesus Freak. . .or putting it another way, he found out as he tried to go on, that the problems created by going on were more than he could perceive himself. He just can’t handle them . . . so he is running back.

 

Question:    How can we know, based on your theory, which therapeutic approach we should use in a given transition or clinical situation – at a given level?

 

Dr. Graves   It depends upon what you’re seeing with here in terms of which transition. If one is working with an individual in attempting to aid or to foster or even instigate a transition from the C-P to the D-Q system, then my position is that you’d better know Skinner backwards and forwards and you’d better stay right with the principles of Skinner.

                                                         

Yesterday, I gave an instrument, which I’m working on, to my students, in which I was testing to find out how many in the class group operated at the level of human existence where they could work with a rough, tough, nasty delinquent kid operating at the C-P level. There isn’t a student in my room that I would hire in Virginia to do this job.

 

{Dr. Graves was asked by the administrators of the Virginia State Department of Corrections and Welfare in Richmond , Virginia in the late 1960s to come down and visit with them regarding his theory. They told him that they had looked at a wide range of theories related to working with prisoners in an effort to bring about successful change in behavior. They told him that none of the theories that they had reviewed had made that much sense to them . . . but that his theory – Levels of Existence Theory - did make sense to them. He told us (the Graves group meeting in Washington, D. C. with Dr. Graves at that time) that this unique group of administrators had given him a “blank check” to come down to the Virginia prison system and to do, in a sense, whatever he wanted to do put his theory into practice. It was during this time in Virginia when he was working with so many prisoners at the C-P level that he was able to obtain many of his chemical insights.}

 

previous < | 58 | >next
 

  
© 2002, Copyright William R. Lee and NVC Consulting
www.ClareWGraves.com