From the Historical Collection of the work of Dr. Clare W. Graves
William R. Lee                                                            - presentations, papers, recorded transcripts, notes -                                                             February 2002
Seminar on Levels of Human Existence, Washington School of Psychiatry, October, 1971


 

Part II   The following information consists of some notes and the reorganized transcription from audio tapes – made by William R. Lee – recorded at The Washington School of Psychiatry on October 16-18, 1971, when Dr. Clare W. Graves presented a  Seminar on Levels of Human Existence.

_____________________________________________________________________________

 

{Although it was October in 1971, it was a very warm weekend when Dr. Graves made this presentation in a 2-1/2 day seminar in an old red brick townhouse type of building close to downtown Washington, D. C. The air conditioning had been turned off in the old building and we had to open the windows. As Dr. Graves talked, we tried to tape his presentation and the sounds of the city, the street noises of cars and trucks, made it difficult at times to hear some of the questions. I have taken the liberty of reconstructing some of the questions from the audience that were not clear on the tape recording.}

 

Dr. Graves:

            I have been working on a systems conception of personality – and the values paper – {An Open System Theory of Values, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Fall 1970, No. 2} - - is an offshoot as are other articles which have been published- simply offshoots of the basic theoretical point of view. So I think that the best thing that we can do to give you a comprehension of just what I am doing and why I am doing it, is to drop back nineteen years when I started this work. And to see what it was that I was concerned with at that time; how I proceeded forward; what I did in the way of data collection; what I ran into when the data started to come in; and what eventually arose out of it in the way of a conception of human behavior and then go on from there to find out what some of the ramifications of this point of view are. Now the ramifications, which we can get to this afternoon, involve considerable more in the matter of the simple application of the theoretical point of view to the understanding and possible solution of some of our human problems because it has turned out with time that this vehicle which I have developed may have the capability of integrating within it almost all that has been put down in the literature about psychological behavior.

 

            One of the things I came to, with time, as you will see, is, that in my mind, we do not have any argument, what-so-ever, as to whose theory of human behavior is correct or is the best. The vehicle that we are going to look at will say to you that all of them are correct and the thing that is important is to see how they are all correct and what their relationship is to one another. And – the other thing about it is, at least I have found and others who have been working with me, that the vehicle does have a capacity of taking the tremendous amount of confusing and contradictory information that we have in the field of the behavioral sciences and removing the confusion and contradiction. So that is why I want to start this morning with the reason for the research and the areas of research concern – the basic research problem and the like.

 

I. The Beginning – The Reason for the Research: 

 

            When I entered into this research I had about had it with the profession of which I am a part. I had gotten sick and tired of going into the classroom and having to referee the argument as to whose research was right or whose theory was right. I had just gotten to the point where in the summer of 1952 I was really seriously considering that there must be some other way a man can make a living. And – I didn’t want to go back into the classroom again. Even though I love the classroom setting I was just so sick to my stomach and the like, that I didn’t want to go back into it again, and I said to myself: I just can’t go back in there unless in some manner or another I can at least think that I am attempting to get this situation, that is confronting me, in hand.

 

previous < | 23 | >next
 

  
© 2002, Copyright William R. Lee and NVC Consulting
www.ClareWGraves.com